Friction identified with evidence
Analytics, session recordings and funnel data show where visitors hesitate or leave, not where we assume they do.
01 · RESEARCHAxtivon runs structured conversion rate optimization programmes for Dutch and EU businesses, identifying real friction through analytics and session data, forming hypotheses tied to business impact, and testing changes properly before they reach every visitor. Not every test wins, and we report on that honestly.
Conversion rate optimization for teams that already have traffic and want more from it
Conversion rate optimization is a research discipline: identifying real friction through data, then testing changes in a structured, statistically sound way. It is not a redesign based on preference or a competitor's layout. Axtivon builds a CRO programme around analytics, session recordings and observed user behaviour, forms hypotheses tied to measurable business outcomes, and runs A/B or sequential tests long enough to draw a reliable conclusion, whether that conclusion confirms the hypothesis or not.
Every hypothesis is tied to a measurable outcome, and every test is run long enough to know whether the result is real or noise.
Analytics, session recordings and funnel data show where visitors hesitate or leave, not where we assume they do.
01 · RESEARCHEvery test is prioritised by its likely effect on revenue or leads, not by novelty or internal opinion.
02 · PRIORITISATIONSample size and test duration are planned in advance so results reach statistical significance before a decision is made.
03 · TESTINGWins are implemented and losses are reported just as clearly, both are useful evidence for the next test.
04 · REPORTINGFrom a single high-traffic landing page to an ongoing testing programme across the full funnel, the scope is set by where the data shows the biggest opportunity.
Analytics review, session recordings, heatmaps and funnel analysis to find where visitors actually struggle.
Analytics and trackingFindings are turned into specific, testable hypotheses ranked by expected business impact.
Lead generationStructured experiments run with proper sample sizing, so results hold up beyond the test itself.
Website optimisationTest-informed changes to layout, messaging and flow, built on evidence rather than a redesign brief.
UI/UX and Figma to websiteReducing friction at the exact steps where analytics shows drop-off, from cart to confirmation.
WooCommerce developmentClear before-and-after reporting on statistical significance, revenue impact and what to test next.
Analytics and trackingEach stage produces a concrete output, so testing stays disciplined instead of turning into a string of unrelated design tweaks.
We audit GA4, funnel data and existing tracking to confirm the data is trustworthy before drawing conclusions from it.
Output: tracking audit and data baselineSession recordings, heatmaps and on-site feedback show where and why visitors hesitate or abandon.
Output: friction and drop-off findingsFindings become specific hypotheses, scored and prioritised by expected impact and effort.
Output: prioritised testing roadmapEach test is scoped with a clear success metric, required sample size and expected run time before it goes live.
Output: test brief and buildTests run until they reach statistical significance, monitored to rule out technical or seasonal distortion.
Output: validated test resultWinning changes are implemented, results are reported clearly, wins and losses alike, and the next hypothesis is queued.
Output: result report and next testThe exact scope depends on traffic volume and funnel complexity, but every CRO programme brings these disciplines together.
CRO depends on trustworthy tracking and feeds directly into the campaigns and systems that bring visitors to the site in the first place.
Conversion work is easy to do badly, a redesign dressed up as optimisation. We treat it as a research process with rules.
Every hypothesis starts from analytics or observed behaviour, not a preference.
Sample size and duration are planned so results are reliable, not lucky.
Losing tests are reported as clearly as winning ones.
Tests are ranked by business impact, not ease or novelty.
Findings inform design, development and campaign work, not just one page.
CRO combines analytics review, session recordings and user behaviour research to identify real friction points, then tests specific changes against a control using A/B or sequential testing. Decisions are based on statistically significant results, not opinion or a general best-practice checklist.
Enough visitors to reach statistical significance within a reasonable timeframe, this varies by conversion rate and the size of the effect being tested. For lower-traffic sites, we often start with qualitative research and sequential testing rather than a traditional A/B split.
Long enough to reach the sample size calculated in advance, usually a minimum of one to two full business cycles to account for weekly and seasonal variation. We do not stop a test early just because an early result looks promising.
We report it honestly. A null result still tells us something, it rules out a hypothesis and informs what to test next. Not every test wins, and treating inconclusive results as failures would undermine the discipline of the process.
No, it complements it. Good design reduces the number of problems worth testing; CRO finds and validates the improvements that remain, particularly the ones that are not obvious from a visual review alone.
Reliable testing depends on accurate GA4 and tag tracking, and results feed directly into paid search, CRM and design decisions elsewhere in the business, which is why we treat it as connected work rather than an isolated project.