Efficient crawling
Crawl budget spent on pages that matter, with low-value and duplicate URLs kept out of the way.
01 · CRAWLABILITYAxtivon audits and fixes the technical layer that decides whether your content ever gets a chance to rank: crawlability, indexation, page speed, structured data and clean URLs. It is unglamorous work, but it is the foundation every ranking, every AI citation and every piece of content sits on.
Technical SEO for sites where the technical layer is limiting visibility
Technical SEO covers everything that determines whether search engines can crawl, index and correctly understand your site, independent of the content itself. That includes crawl budget and log file behaviour, indexation control, canonicalisation and duplicate content, redirect chains and URL hygiene, Core Web Vitals and rendering, and structured data that clarifies entities and content type. Strong content on a technically broken site still underperforms, search engines cannot rank what they cannot reliably crawl, render and index.
Every fix should either widen what search engines can access or clarify what they find, so content and authority have room to actually perform.
Crawl budget spent on pages that matter, with low-value and duplicate URLs kept out of the way.
01 · CRAWLABILITYThe index reflects the pages you intend it to, not an accumulation of parameters, staging URLs and thin pages.
02 · INDEXATIONCore Web Vitals and rendering performance addressed at the code and asset level, not patched with a plugin.
03 · PERFORMANCESchema markup that correctly describes your content, so search engines and AI systems have less to guess.
04 · CLARITYFrom a single crawl audit to an ongoing technical programme, the work is scoped to what is actually limiting crawling, indexation or rankings.
Crawl behaviour reviewed against server logs to see what search engines actually request, not just what a crawler tool assumes.
SEO and AI search visibilityRobots directives, XML sitemaps, pagination and internal linking configured so the right pages get indexed and the wrong ones don't.
Website optimisationCanonical tags, parameter handling and near-duplicate URLs resolved so pages stop competing against each other.
Website optimisationLCP, INP and CLS addressed at the source, render-blocking assets, unoptimised images and layout shift, not just measured.
WordPress developmentOrganisation, product, article and FAQ schema implemented and validated so search engines and AI systems parse your content correctly.
SEO and AI search visibilityRedirect maps and URL structures built for platform migrations and replatforms, so rankings survive the move.
Website optimisationEach stage has a clear output, so fixes are prioritised by actual impact on crawling and indexation, not guesswork.
We crawl the site as a search engine would and cross-reference it against server logs to see actual crawl behaviour.
Output: technical audit with prioritised issuesWe map what is indexed against what should be, and identify duplicate, thin or conflicting URLs.
Output: indexation and canonicalisation planCore Web Vitals, render-blocking resources and rendering behaviour are diagnosed at the code level.
Output: performance fix listSchema markup is built and validated for the content types and entities relevant to your site.
Output: validated structured dataIssues are resolved in priority order, with redirects mapped carefully wherever URLs change.
Output: implemented fixes and redirect mapWe confirm crawling, indexation and Core Web Vitals improved as expected, then set up ongoing monitoring.
Output: verified results and monitoring setupThe exact scope depends on site size and history, but every technical SEO engagement brings these disciplines together.
We connect technical SEO work to content, paid search and the platform it runs on, so fixes hold and rankings compound instead of resetting.
Technical SEO problems are rarely visible from the front end. Finding them requires reading log files, crawl data and rendering behaviour directly, not guessing from a checklist.
We read actual crawler behaviour, not just what a crawl tool simulates.
Issues resolved in code and configuration, not patched with plugins.
LCP, INP and CLS diagnosed and fixed, not just monitored.
Schema built to validate cleanly and match the content it describes.
Redirect maps built and tested to protect rankings through change.
Technical SEO covers crawlability, indexation, site speed, structured data and URL health, the mechanics that determine whether search engines can access and understand your site. General SEO also includes content and keyword strategy, which depends on the technical foundation being sound to have any effect.
We cross-reference crawl data against server log files to see how search engines actually behave on the site, not just how a crawler simulation predicts they will. This surfaces crawl budget waste, rendering issues and indexation gaps that crawl tools alone often don't catch.
Core Web Vitals are one ranking input among many, so the effect varies by site and competition. What is consistent is that slow, unstable pages hurt conversion and user experience regardless of ranking impact, which is why we treat the fix as worthwhile independent of the algorithmic effect.
Canonicalisation tells search engines which version of a page, among near-duplicates created by parameters, filters or trailing slashes, should be treated as authoritative. Without it, duplicate URLs can split ranking signals and waste crawl budget on pages that shouldn't be indexed separately.
Yes, which is why redirect mapping, canonical changes and indexation directives are tested before and verified after implementation. Untested changes to robots.txt, canonical tags or redirects are a common cause of accidental ranking loss during migrations.
Yes. AI systems still need to crawl, render and parse your pages before they can cite them, and structured data plays a direct role in how clearly they understand what a page is about. A technically sound site is a prerequisite for AI search visibility, not a separate concern.